The Canadian Centre for Housing Rights (CCHR) partnered with the Women’s National Housing and Homelessness Network (WNHHN) and the National Right to Housing Network (NRHN) on a project funded by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) Solutions Lab. Started two years ago, the project aimed to develop and prototype national shelter standards that adopt a rights-based and gender-sensitive approach to help improve emergency shelter service delivery.
In Canada, women and gender-diverse people are more likely to have trouble finding a safe and secure place to live, and disproportionately live in core housing need. For those who experience homelessness, they are often denied access to emergency shelters that are operating over capacity and are struggling to meet demand due to chronic underfunding and an increase in housing need. Additionally, certain policies, rules and practices in emergency shelters may lead to people being turned away, separated from their children or unable to access supports.
These issues can have devastating impacts on women and gender-diverse persons who are in need of shelter services, and present barriers to realizing the right to housing. It is critical that we change the way that emergency shelters are designed so that they align with a rights-based and gender-sensitive approach to housing.
To help address these challenges, this project explored together with lived experts, advocates and shelter providers seeks to identify what shelters in Canada could look like if they were gender-sensitive and aligned with the right to housing. To transform emergency shelter service delivery for women and gender-diverse people, we developed and prototyped national shelter standards that use a rights-based and gender-sensitive approach. These standards can help to better meet the needs of women and gender-diverse people in accessing emergency shelter services.
The development of these Shelter Standards has been a deeply collaborative effort, aiming to create a robust framework that addresses the complex unique challenges faced by women and gender-diverse individuals accessing emergency shelters across Canada.
At each step of the development process, a diverse range of key actors, including people with lived experiences, service providers, human rights experts, and advocacy groups, were extensively engaged. This inclusive approach ensured that the standards reflected a comprehensive understanding of the genuine needs and dynamic realities faced by those accessing emergency shelters.
These Shelter Standards are grounded in a comprehensive framework that merges international human rights principles with a Gender-Based Analysis Plus (GBA+) approach. By drawing from international treaties, human rights frameworks, and best practices, the standards aim to set a high bar for emergency shelter operations while remaining sensitive to the unique needs of diverse gender identities and expressions.
The Standards aim to:
These Shelters Standards will also become a joint submission to the upcoming National Housing Council’s review panel. On May 11th, 2023, the Federal Housing Advocate announced the second human rights-based review panel under the National Housing Strategy Act (NHSA) on the Government of Canada’s failure to prevent and eliminate homelessness amongst women and gender-diverse people, particularly those who are Indigenous.
This review panel process will give people with lived experience of gender-based homelessness and housing precarity—as well as civil society allies—an opportunity to share their experiences and solutions and hold the Government accountable in a way that was not possible before.
This will be the second human rights-based review panel conducted in Canada (the first of which is still ongoing on the issue of the financialization of purpose-built rental housing. These review panels are new oversight and human rights-based accountability mechanisms under Canada’s right-to-housing legislation, the National Housing Strategy Act of 2019.
This project is generously supported by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) Solutions Lab.
We would also like to recognize the invaluable contributions of members of the National Advisory Committee of this project, and the many organizations and individuals that have lent their expertise and experience to the development of these standards.
NATIONAL
ATLANTIC CANADA
New brunswick
CENTRAL CANADA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
WESTERN CANADA
MANITOBA
Alberta
British Columbia
NATIONAL
ATLANTIC CANADA
Newfoundland and Labrador
NOVA SCOTIA
CENTRAL CANADA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
WESTERN CANADA
MANITOBA
saskatchewan
Alberta
British Columbia
The federal, provincial, and territorial governments have significant resources and policy levers at their disposal to tackle the housing affordability crisis and ensure secure, affordable homes for everyone in Canada. Below, we outline key housing-related investments in each of the 2024 federal, provincial, and territorial budgets and assess their potential to advance the right to housing by supporting renters and investing in affordable housing.
FEDERAL
Budget 2024: Fairness for Every Generation
It is encouraging to see the federal government take a leadership role in tackling the housing crisis through a comprehensive approach by investing in a range of programs to increase housing supply, preserve and build affordable housing, protect renters, and address homelessness.
However, it is concerning that the government remains focused primarily on building more housing supply, despite evidence that more supply will not address housing affordability. In addition, that budget is missing a number of measures that CCHR recommended, including leveraging public lands for deeply affordable housing, expanding the Canada Housing Benefit, increasing investments in the Urban, Rural, and Northern Indigenous housing strategy, and implementing measures to address the financialization of housing and advance the right to housing. Read CCHR’s in-depth analysis here.
Reiterating many of the announcements from the recent Canada Housing Plan, the 2024 federal budget includes several key housing commitments. Highlights include:
ATLANTIC CANADA
New brunswick
Budget 2024-25 – Stronger than Ever: Let’s Keep Building
The 2024-25 budget increases investments in housing by 54 per cent over its previous budget. To reach provincial targets to reduce the number of households spending over 30 per cent of their income on rent and decrease the number of households on the subsidized housing waitlist, the budget prioritizes the provision of rent supplements. The government also aims to hold annual rent increases at an average of 2.5 per cent. However, rather than reinstating ever loosening rent regulations, the province intends to achieve that target by relying on the construction of new housing supply. Yet, in the absence of strong rent regulations, new supply on its own will not keep rent increases reasonable.
Development of the community housing sector is largely absent from this budget, with only 380 public housing units targeted for development over three years. Meanwhile, housing advocates have emphasized the need for investments to create 10,000 public housing units and preserve currently affordable units and land.
New Brunswick’s 2024-2025 budget includes many of the investments committed in the 2023 NB Housing Strategy: Housing For All:
Newfoundland and labrador
Budget 2024 – Transforming: Our Health. Our Economy. Our Province
Through its 2024 budget, the province makes some investments to build and maintain public and supportive housing, while funding rent supplements and initiatives to stimulate market housing construction more generously. While CMHC forecasted that Newfoundland requires an additional 60,000 homes by 2030 beyond typical development trends, there are 17,510 households that require affordable housing now.
Advocates welcomed new funding toward affordable housing and homelessness initiatives, especially given that 50 per cent of the population experiencing homelessness in St. John’s are from other areas of the province, while the city has limited resources to adequately address the depth of need.
Newfoundland and Labrador’s 2024 Budget contains the following housing investments:
NOVA SCOTIA
Building Nova Scotia, Faster: Budget 2024-25
The 2024-25 budget invests heavily in initiatives to create more housing supply, following the province’s recent Housing Needs Assessment Report. The report identified the need for more student housing to lessen demand elsewhere in the market, while also noting the increasing cost of construction and employment vacancies in the construction industry as barriers to new housing supply.
With a budget focused largely on supply, investment in initiatives to protect affordable housing and assist households currently struggling with affordability are sorely missed. As we identified in our pre-budget submission, 8,500 rent supplements and modest investment in new public housing are insufficient to meet the needs of low- and moderate-income Nova Scotians.
Moreover, the rent regulation framework in Nova Scotia allows landlords to raise rents with impunity when there is renter turnover. A fixed-term lease loophole, which permits the use of leases with end dates, allows landlords to continually turnover units to new renters at higher rents. The government’s lack of action towards preserving existing affordable units and/or providing all renters with security of tenure is a glaring gap that will allow rents to continue to rise to unattainable levels, despite new supply.
Housing related investments in the 2024-2025 Nova Scotia budget include:
Prince edward island
2024-25 Prince Edward Island Budget
It is encouraging to see the budget prioritize investments to build, preserve, and operate non-profit, co-operative, and public housing, which is critical to support households in greatest housing need and ensure long term affordability. However, housing advocates noted that PEI has lost a significant number of affordable housing units and questioned the efficacy of the budget’s level of investment in preservation and development efforts at this stage in the housing crisis.
The budget also fails to provide support for existing renters, following calls from advocates and opposition parties for an extension of the expired moratorium on renovictions until November 2024, in the midst of record-low vacancy rates. Advocates have similarly been seeking further renter supports and protections, including a rent registry to prevent illegal rent increases and a provincial maintenance standards regulation enforced through public inspectors (following the dilution of maintenance standards in the recently updated Residential Tenancy Act).
The 2024-25 Prince Edward Island (PEI) operating budget follows the launch of its five-year housing strategy and includes:
CENTRAL CANADA
ONTARIO
2024 Ontario Budget: Building a Better Ontario
Aside from the modest supportive housing investments, the budget prioritizes “attainable” housing initiatives (which it has yet to define), with minimal commitments toward preserving and building deeply affordable, non-market housing for low income households. This is reflected in current trends, as the vast majority of provincial housing starts over the past year have been in the private market. The promise of supportive housing development next year pales in comparison to the current depth of need, including for people experiencing homelessness.
The budget also fails to provide support or stabilization for renters, such as housing subsidies, stronger rent regulations, and greater accountability and enforcement of renter rights. Further, housing advocates had called for the budget to invest in a community housing acquisition fund, an urban, rural, and northern Indigenous housing strategy, and mechanisms to address financialization and implement the right to housing.
Following its recent red tape reduction bill, the province continues to prioritize initiatives to stimulate new housing supply with insufficient or absent affordability requirements. It also remains to be seen whether Ontario will receive National Housing Strategy funding after failing to meet its commitments to build more affordable housing.
The 2024 Ontario budget includes some new and previously announced housing investments, focused primarily on building new supply:
QUEBEC
2024 Quebec Budget: Priorities: Health and Education
The Quebec budget brings investments in housing to $6.3 billion between 2019 and 2029, with the aim of creating 23,000 new affordable housing units across the province. However, funding for housing decreased by 4.9 per cent compared to last year, while construction is lagging, with close to 12,500 new units already funded but not yet built.
FRAPRU and other housing advocates expressed their disappointment in the lack of meaningful investments in social and non-profit housing, calling for the government to double its current housing supply targets and build 50,000 social housing units by 2029 to meet the needs of Quebec renters.
The 2024 Quebec budget outlines how previous funding commitments will be disbursed between existing housing programs over the next five years:
WESTERN CANADA
MANITOBA
One Future. One People. One Manitoba. Budget 2024
Prior to the release of the budget, CCHR outlined several priorities for housing investments through our advocacy and media engagement. While the 2024 budget funds the acquisition or construction of new affordable housing, the 350 units of social housing promised is far short of the 1,000 rent-geared-to-income housing units needed, according to Manitoba’s Right to Housing Coalition. Moreover, the $67.8 million investment in social housing capital maintenance and modernization is welcome, but accounts for less than half of what the Manitoba Non-Profit Housing Association says is needed each year to ensure the sustainability of the community housing sector.
Under the newly created department of Housing, Addictions and Homelessness, the 2024 Manitoba budget includes:
saskatchewan
2024-25 Saskatchewan Budget: Classrooms, Care & Communities
It is encouraging that the Saskatchewan government is focusing most of its new housing-related budget spending on social housing maintenance, alongside investments in supportive housing and other homelessness supports. However, long-term government divestment from its public housing portfolio has led to significant maintenance and repair backlogs, record vacancy levels, and overall reduction in the provincial social housing stock. In tandem with policy changes reducing the eligibility of moderate-income households to access subsidized housing, this approach has led to increased rates of homelessness and housing need across the province.
While the budget includes incentives for private sector housing development through tax rebates and funding for secondary suites, it fails to invest in the expansion of affordable, non-market housing, which is fundamental to meet the needs of low and moderate-income households, especially in light of the limited availability and habitability of its existing public housing stock. Moreover, the budget includes minimal support for renters, with a minor increase to shelter benefits available to SIS recipients (following previous cuts) and no additional investments in the Saskatchewan Housing Benefit.
The 2024-25 Saskatchewan budget includes:
ALBERTA
2024 Alberta Budget: A Responsible Plan for a Growing Province
Alberta’s total budget for housing and homelessness exceeds $1 billion in funding, with $829 million to build new affordable housing and preserve existing units, representing a 75 per cent increase from last year’s budget. It is promising to see the Alberta government increasing housing supports for marginalized populations and dedicating more funding toward subsidized housing and non-profit housing providers.
However, over half of the budget’s capital investments are geared towards private sector incentives, while funding for housing affordability pales in comparison with the depth of need, particularly for low-income renters. Budget 2024 provides assistance to 5,650 households, in addition to the 58,600 the province is currently supporting, which represents a mere 3.5 per cent of all households in need. Additionally, in spite of a strong start to 2024 for new builds, home prices are surging and rents have increased to a record high.
Housing advocates in Calgary have lauded the more progressive measures in the housing budget, while advocates in Edmonton have deplored cuts made to emergency assistance funding. While the budget addresses some of the measures that CCHR recommended, it is missing crucial measures to improve housing affordability, such as prioritizing non-profit developers to build new affordable supply and indexing rent supplements to inflation. Without strong rent regulations and meaningful investments in social and community housing, the encouraging steps the government has taken to increase housing supports and preserve existing units will signify little in the face of escalating housing and living costs.
The 2024 Alberta budget increases investments over the next three years to advance existing housing and shelter programs, focusing on building new supply:
British Columbia
Budget 2024: Taking action for people and families in B.C.
While the 2024 budget for housing is modest compared to the previous year, the province is still making significant investments in housing that complement a string of recent legislative measures to increase residential density, protect renters, and preserve affordable housing. Over the next three years, $2.4 billion in capital spending will be dedicated to housing, with an 115 per cent increase in funding for housing subsidies and incentives.
However, while the introduction of additional supports for renters has been welcomed, the budget continues to prioritize attainable homeownership for moderate-income households. The new supply expected under B.C. Builds would need to be 12 to 15 times higher to meet demand for housing across the province. As B.C. continues to lead the country in high rent prices, current housing investments are insufficient to provide enough affordable housing for low- to moderate-income renters. The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and B.C. Non-Profit Housing Association note that the tax exemption funding for homeownership, along with the homeowner grant program, could be put to better use if directed towards rent supports and investments in non-market supply.
The 2024 B.C. budget prioritizes supports for renters, while continuing to fund new housing supply over the next three years:
NORTHERN CANADA
NUNAVUT
Nunavut Budget 2024-2025
Most renter households in Nunavut have limited interaction with the market. In Iqaluit, for instance, most of the rental housing is non-market based. Leases are typically held by government organizations and rented out as social housing through the Nunavut Housing Corporation (which administers 22 per cent of all rental units in Iqaluit) or as government staff housing. Employers also typically hold leases and rent units out as employee housing for private firms. As such, housing funding in the budget is mainly directed towards maintaining existing and building new public housing.
However, Nunavut has the highest level of housing need in Canada. Approximately 49 per cent of the population cannot secure housing that is affordable in the private market, which underscores the need for more rental supplements to support renters in the private market, in addition to the current funding commitments for public sector housing.
The 2024-2025 Nunavut budget includes:
YUKON
Yukon Budget 2024-2025
It is promising to see funding going towards renovating units owned by the Yukon Housing Corporation, through which the territorial government provides a significant amount of affordable housing stock. It is also encouraging to see funding for new affordable homes and Housing First projects, the development of supportive units and rental housing, and rental subsidies. Investments in rental subsidies are crucial, as the most recent data available shows that 20 per cent of families in Whitehorse cannot afford market housing without financial assistance.
Some advocates have called for greater investment in rural land development to improve housing access. CCHR has recommended that land development policies should prioritize affordable and non-profit housing to ensure that public investments result in deeply affordable housing units.
The 2024-2025 Yukon budget includes:

On April 12, 2024, the federal government unveiled a new housing strategy – Canada’s Housing Plan – as a significant part of its 2024 budget. The plan aims to “solve the housing crisis” by investing in programs to increase housing supply, preserve and build affordable housing, protect renters, and address homelessness.
It is encouraging to see the federal government take a leadership role in tackling the housing crisis through a comprehensive approach with significant new investments and a suite of measures. This demonstrates the government’s recognition that building more supply alone will not address the housing crisis, and that distinct policies and programs are needed to ensure housing affordability.
However, we are concerned that the government remains focused primarily on building more housing supply as the key solution to the crisis, despite evidence that more supply will not address the primary challenge facing millions of people across Canada today: affordability. To effectively address the housing affordability crisis, the government must prioritize policies and programs that specifically address housing affordability, alongside robust protections for renters.
Canada’s Housing Plan contains a number of promising measures that can help address housing affordability, representing a renewed federal approach to housing policy following decades of inaction and half measures. Beginning in the 1980s, Canadian governments progressively retreated from these important interventions in housing, and since then, have relied almost exclusively on the private market to meet Canadians’ diverse housing needs. In 2017, the federal government introduced a National Housing Strategy, but it was unambitious, underfunded, and proved to be ineffective. The housing affordability crisis has continued to worsen, to the point that more than half of Canadian renters are worried about being able to pay their rent. This new plan sends an encouraging signal that the government may finally be starting to take the crisis seriously.
It is also encouraging that the plan includes some recognition of the need for distinct programs and policies that directly target affordability, which we recommended in our pre-budget submission. These measures include, over the next five years:
These are important programs that housing advocates have long called for to address the escalating housing affordability crisis. While we welcome these announcements, they pale in comparison to the depth of need across the country. The total investment of $27.1 billion (including the new funding of $3.8 billion) directed toward affordability measures and addressing homelessness is not responsive to the scale of the housing affordability crisis. To take just two examples: Canada is currently losing 46,000 affordable units annually to rent increases, demolitions, and conversions, but the Canada Rental Protection Fund will prevent the loss of only 2,500 – just over five per cent – of those units. Similarly, to address the depth of housing need facing Indigenous Peoples living in urban, rural and northern areas, estimates range from $4.3 billion to $5.6 billion per year over ten years, but the government has committed only $600 million per year over seven years.
Canadian Renters’ Bill of Rights
One of the most promising announcements in Canada’s Housing Plan is the development of a Canadian Renters’ Bill of Rights. Renters across the country are facing soaring rent costs, few affordable options, and limited housing security. Without adequate protections against excessive rents, rent gouging, and eviction, renters are increasingly facing housing precarity and homelessness. Current renter protections are a patchwork and vary significantly between provinces and territories. At a minimum, the Renters’ Bill of Rights could help ensure all renters have the right to reasonable rents and protection from eviction, while helping to mitigate the ongoing loss of existing affordable homes when renters are evicted or displaced.
To develop an effective Renters’ Bill of Rights, the federal government must engage with renter communities, organizations that represent them, and legal experts on renter protections to ensure that it reflects renters’ real-life experiences. The right to a reasonable rent is especially important given the low level of investment in direct housing affordability measures in Canada’s Housing Plan. In the absence of sufficient investments in non-market housing, most renters in Canada will continue living in private market buildings. With only five per cent of Canada’s housing stock owned by the public and non-profit sectors, housing prices are dictated by market forces. Effective rent regulation is essential to uphold renters’ rights.
The Renters’ Bill of Rights could provide a crucial standard for every province and territory to strive towards. While this will require cooperation between different levels of government, it is not unprecedented. For example, over the course of 20 years after it was introduced by the federal government, the National Building Code was adopted by every province and territory as a standard for building design and construction. We are also encouraged that the federal government is looking to hold other levels of government accountable by making some housing funding conditional on provinces and territories adopting elements of the Renters’ Bill of Rights. When the federal government funds housing development, it is reasonable to expect that the housing it funds will be secure and affordable for the people who live in it.
Other supports for renters
We are glad to see the federal government recognize the need for legal aid for renters, alongside support for organizations that raise awareness of renters’ rights through its new Tenant Protection Fund. However, $15 million over five years is not nearly enough to respond to the level of need facing renters, especially considering the limited resources currently available for renters facing displacement and discrimination across the country.
We are also pleased to see the government introduce new rules to allow renters to decide if they would like their rental payment history to be taken into account for their credit score. This opt-in approach will help ensure that renters who are struggling to pay their rent on time due to the mounting housing affordability crisis are not negatively impacted.
While it is encouraging that the government has recognized affordability and renters’ rights in its housing plan, those are disproportionately small parts of the overall strategy. In contrast, measures to incentivize the private market to build more housing comprise the vast majority of the plan. These include a little over $66.3 billion in grants, loans, and other supports for developers, and changes to zoning and permitting rules to make building quicker and cheaper. It also includes a freeze on the fees that municipalities can charge developers, a previously announced GST rebate for rental construction, and other tax breaks, all of which represent additional costs of lost tax revenue. These amounts together represent a much larger allocation than the $27.1 billion allocated to affordable housing and addressing homelessness.
In the absence of robust affordability requirements, new private market housing will not be affordable, especially for low- and moderate-income residents. Moreover, increasing supply does not meaningfully lower rents in existing homes. The supply approach is contingent on higher income residents moving into new higher-cost homes, freeing up their existing lower-cost homes to be passed on to low- and moderate-income residents. However, in the absence of effective rent regulation, there is nothing keeping those existing homes affordable. Even the strongest proponents of the supply approach acknowledge that rent decreases spurred by new supply are negligible. Empirical studies have found that building supply “was so slow and had so little effect on providing housing to lower income tenants that it could not be pursued as a serious policy strategy” and “is not a meaningful method for producing affordable rental housing.”
In short, the government’s plan to address housing supply shortages in the private market will not meaningfully impact the affordability crisis. To address affordability, new construction must prioritize publicly-owned, non-profit, and co-operative homes. At the same time, new housing built by the private market must be subject to strict affordability requirements to justify public investment.
Unfortunately, the government’s housing plan does not signal that it intends for its significant investments in housing supply to provide affordability. On the contrary, the government noted that existing affordability requirements in the Apartment Construction Loan Program – which are already minimal, inadequate, and ineffective – will be made more “flexible.” In short, the bulk of the government’s plan is to incentivize developers to build more housing that will be unaffordable to most people in Canada.
Leveraging public lands for affordable housing
We are glad to see the federal government launch a new Public Lands for Homes Plan, which aims to leverage publicly-owned lands for housing development, including by leasing lands to retain public ownership over the long term. However, it is critical that public lands and other assets be prioritized for non-market housing to maximize the use of public lands for housing that is truly affordable to communities in need. We are concerned that this new plan fails to do so, reinforcing the government’s overall focus on housing supply over affordability. However, it is encouraging that the government is proposing to prioritize non-market and student housing as part of its plan to convert underused federal offices.
Expanding the Canada Housing Benefit
We are disappointed that Canada’s Housing Plan does not include additional investments in the Canada Housing Benefit (CHB), which provides low-income renters in the private market with funding to help them keep their homes. While rent supplements like the CHB can be a double-edged sword that allow landlords to increase rents in the absence of rent controls, they are also important short-term solutions that can help keep low-income renters housed in the midst of a housing affordability crisis. Paired with a strong Renters’ Bill of Rights, an expansion of the CHB could help protect affordability and security for many low-income renters across the country.
Addressing the financialization of housing
Canada’s Housing Plan includes minimal mention of the role that financialization has played in the housing crisis. In so far as the government is seeking to address the financialization of housing, it intends to consult on opportunities to limit the acquisition of single-family homes by large, corporate investors, with few details or clarity on what this will entail. However, financialization is a much more pervasive issue that threatens affordability and security across housing types. Beyond restricting the corporate acquisition of single-family homes, it is incumbent on the government to also address the growing speculative forces and increased role of financialized actors across the housing sector. In addition, the government should prioritize working closely with the National Housing Council, which recently wrapped up Canada’s first Review Panel to examine the impacts of the financialization of purpose-built rentals.
Advancing the right to housing
Following the explicit focus of the National Housing Strategy (2017) and National Housing Strategy Act (2019) on advancing the right to adequate housing, we are disappointed that Canada’s Housing Plan makes minimal reference to the right to housing. Minimal support is included for the Office of the Federal Housing Advocate in the 2024 budget, while no additional support is provided for the National Housing Council or other organizations that support renters in claiming their right to housing. Considering the disproportionate impacts of the housing affordability crisis on low-income, racialized, and other marginalized communities, it is incumbent on the government to prioritize and maximize investments that will address the housing needs of those most impacted by the crisis.
NATIONAL
ATLANTIC CANADA
NOVA SCOTIA
CENTRAL CANADA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
WESTERN CANADA
MANITOBA
saskatchewan
British Columbia

Yesterday, the federal government announced measures from its upcoming 2024 budget which it says will “make the playing field fairer for renters.”
Renters’ rights are a patchwork across Canada. Each province and territory has its own laws, and they vary dramatically from place to place. To take just two examples, different provincial laws provide vastly different protections – or more often, lack of protections – against evictions and excessive rent increases.
It is high time that the federal government take a leadership role in establishing standards for fair, robust legal protections for renters everywhere in Canada. Today’s announcement is welcome, but the proof will be in the pudding. The government says that it will develop its bill of rights in partnership with provinces and territories. We hope that it will also work closely with renters and renter organizations to understand the real issues they face in the housing crisis.
It is clear that the government needs the help. For example, it says that its bill of rights will “require landlords to disclose a clear history of apartment pricing so renters can bargain fairly.” That would be hugely beneficial in Manitoba, Prince Edward Island, and Quebec, where current laws provide some protection against rent increases between tenancies. But in other provinces, deeply harmful “vacancy decontrol” policies allow landlords to raise rents between renters by any amount, regardless of what they previously charged. The government needs to consult with renters to ensure that the bill of rights includes effective protections such as ending vacancy decontrol.
Only the provinces have the legal authority to amend residential tenancies laws, but a bill of rights would establish national standards for the provinces to meet. Done properly, a renters’ bill of rights has the potential to bring fair, robust protections to renters across Canada.
Renters need legal support. As rents across the country climb out of control, more and more renters are struggling to pay the rent each month – and facing the threat of eviction when they fall short. Eviction cases are decided by tribunals whose proceedings can be hard for renters to understand and navigate – and which are not always set up to be fair. Legal representation can help level the playing field.
Seven provinces and territories provide little or no legal aid for renters facing eviction. The other provinces provide some legal aid, but it’s often plagued by funding shortfalls and cuts. In every province and territory, most renters have to represent themselves in eviction proceedings.
We are glad to see the federal government recognizing that legal aid for renters is important, but $15 million is a drop in the bucket that does not respond to the depth of need and the enormous number of evictions taking place across Canada.
Finally, the federal government says that it will make sure that rental payment history is taken into account in renters’ credit scores. This is a problematic proposal. Although the government says that renters’ credit scores will improve when they pay their rent on time, we are in a housing and affordability crisis. More and more renters, through no fault of their own, are struggling to pay their rent on time. We urge the government to ensure that late or missed rent payments do not negatively impact renters’ credit scores.
While it is encouraging to see greater federal leadership on renters’ rights and protections, these measures alone will not be enough to tackle the housing affordability crisis. As outlined in our federal pre-budget submission, significant investments are needed to build and preserve affordable housing across the country, prioritizing the public, non-profit, and cooperative housing sectors that provide deep affordability over the long term. Moreover, low-income and other marginalized renters need direct short-term support to maintain their housing in the midst of rapidly escalating costs. We also call on the government to adequately fund an Urban, Rural, and Northern Indigenous Housing Strategy, take concrete action to curb the growing financialization of housing, and support the implementation of the right to housing in Canada.
We hope these initial measures announced for renters are the first among many new initiatives in the 2024 budget to ensure all people in Canada can live in secure and affordable homes.

In November 2023, the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) assessed Canada’s human rights record through its Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process, and delivered significant – and warranted – criticism on Canada’s nominal progress in tackling a range of critical human rights issues, including its housing and homelessness crisis. On March 18, the Government of Canada responded to these critiques by simply repeating existing promises.
Meanwhile, advocates across the country have been raising the alarm for decades. The housing and homelessness crisis has reached the point where now a third of renters in Canada cannot afford their rent, many live in overcrowded and poorly maintained homes, and homelessness and encampments are on the rise. In the midst of this escalating crisis, the Canadian government has repeatedly failed to take meaningful action.
This is not the first time the government has faced difficult questions over its human rights record. Every five years, the HRC reviews Canada’s human rights record, and has consistently called out Canada’s inaction on the human right to housing. For years, the HRC called on the federal government to establish a national housing strategy with tangible targets, significant investments, and commitments to take real action.
Finally in 2017, following prolonged national advocacy supported by international pressure through the UPR process, Canada introduced a 10-year National Housing Strategy (NHS), and later passed the National Housing Strategy Act (NHSA) in 2019. At the time, advocates celebrated the NHSA’s recognition of housing as a fundamental human right. However, the NHS committed to ensuring that only 540,000 households in need have affordable, adequate housing.
This target pales in comparison to the depth of need across the country: 1.5 million households are currently living in unaffordable, overcrowded, and/or dilapidated housing, and 235,000 people experience homelessness each year. The government has failed to meet even its own strategy’s insufficient goals.
In the absence of meaningful action, Canada’s housing and homelessness crisis has only gotten worse, and those in greatest need – women, Indigenous Peoples, newcomers, racialized communities, people with disabilities, seniors, 2SLGBTQI+ people, and people experiencing homelessness – continue to face the worst outcomes.
Alongside the UPR’s ongoing critiques of Canada’s inaction, the National Housing Council – a government body tasked to assess the NHS’s effectiveness – released a scathing report last year, calling for the strategy’s complete overhaul. The report noted that despite committing over $70 billion through the NHS, Canada is losing affordable housing faster than it is creating it: for every affordable home built under the NHS, two are lost. Moreover, most housing being built under the NHS is not affordable to those in greatest need, due in part to significant financing going to the private sector – which has consistently failed to produce deeply affordable homes – in addition to flawed affordability requirements that ultimately produce unaffordable homes.
Meanwhile, in its most recent Fall Economic Statement, Canada announced an additional $15 billion for private sector rental construction, alongside funding for only 7,000 new non-market – public, non-profit, and co-operative – homes. Experts estimate that Canada requires one million such homes in the next decade to meet the current depth of housing need and address homelessness.
The federal government – alongside the provinces, territories, and municipalities – continues to prioritize building new housing supply with inadequate or outright absent affordability requirements. This approach relies on the theory that building new unaffordable housing frees up affordable housing for those in need. Studies have shown that this approach does not improve housing affordability (especially in the short-term) and may actually raise the cost of existing homes.
Yesterday, Canada responded to the HRC by only adopting the most vague of its recommendations to address housing and homelessness. What’s more, Canada refused to adopt any of the HRC’s specific recommendations to fully implement and strengthen the NHSA. Instead, it simply repeated its existing, inadequate targets, without acknowledging that it is failing to achieve even those targets.
Following years of inaction and an escalating crisis, Canada had the chance to finally prove itself as a housing leader on the international stage – especially as it bids for a seat on the UN Human Rights Council – and begin to take its commitment to realize the right to housing seriously. Instead, it has once again chosen to ignore its responsibilities to realize the rights of Canadians and continues to fan the flames of a devastating crisis.
The Low-end of Market Rental (LEMR) Housing Monitor project aims to build an understanding of the scale of and change in affordable housing stock in Canada, through the lens of six major urban centres: Calgary, Halifax, Greater Montreal Area, Greater Toronto Area, Metro Vancouver Area, and Winnipeg.
The project was developed by the Canadian Centre for Housing Rights (CCHR), Purpose Analytics, the Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association (ONPHA) and R and Shiny Developer Sharla Gelfand, with generous support from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s Housing Supply Challenge.
The lack of affordable rental housing across the country has resulted in a crisis in many Canadian cities, especially for lower-income renters who face increasing difficulties securing a home they can afford. Despite growing attention paid to this issue, little is currently known about the scale and scope of the existing deeply affordable housing stock in Canada, or about changes taking place at the low-end of the private rental market, which are the most affordable private housing options available to residents.
The project produced an online tool called the Low-end of Market Rental (LEMR) Housing Monitor, which integrates and aggregates existing data related to the loss of units and the displacement of people living in deeply affordable rental housing in urban areas. The project will also evaluate the potential to use these datasets to produce a modelled estimate of how the supply and location of deeply affordable market rental housing is changing over time.
Data has been brought in from various sources including census data, administrative data from local governments and data from community organizations. The goal is to provide accessible, centralized data that can enrich evidence-based decision-making in housing across Canada.
The LEMR Housing Monitor can be used by policymakers, urban planners, service providers, and community advocates to actively intervene on issues related to housing supply and to monitor the impact of their housing programs and policies. In this way, the tool can empower and equip decision-makers with the best information to make data-driven decisions and address gaps in our understanding of rental housing trends.
The Low-end of Market Rental (LEMR) Housing Monitor is funded by CMHC’s Housing Supply Challenge, a fund aimed at creating solutions to overcoming barriers to the creation of new housing supply in Canada. The focus of the data-driven round of the challenge is on improving access to data so that it can be utilized in important housing decisions. The Housing Supply Challenge is one way in which Canada’s National Housing Strategy is promoting informed decision-making throughout government.
In the absence of an adequate supply of social and non-profit housing, it is the “low end” of the private rental market where the majority of lower-income renters must seek housing, and it is this supply that appears to be declining the fastest. Deeply affordable rental housing, or low-end of market rentals, represents a critical component of the housing spectrum, providing homes to lower income households where equity-deserving groups are disproportionately represented.
In a 2020 study, housing policy expert Steve Pomeroy found that from 2011 to 2016, for every new affordable unit of housing created in Canada through government funded programs, Canada lost 15 existing affordable private market rental units. Without a baseline understanding of the current state of affordable housing stock in major cities, and no way to monitor change over time, it is currently impossible for decision-makers to actively intervene on issues related to housing supply and to monitor the impact of housing programs and policies. Although some data on these matters exists, it tends to be scattered in various (and sometimes unknown) locations across Canada’s urban and rural municipalities. There is no central point where this information is stored, systematically organized, and shared.
The LEMR Housing Monitor tool was developed as a response to this gap, and will provide a sophisticated tool serving as a central point to access trustworthy data on deeply affordable private market units. The project will also identify possible data gaps in the six urban centres, and assess where the collection of additional and new data may be necessary.
The LEMR Housing Monitor would not have been possible without the contributions of dozens of organizations and advisors across Canada. We thank them for their invaluable contributions and intrinsic roles in establishing this tool.
The Low-End of Market Rental (LEMR) project received funding from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) under the Housing Supply Challenge. However, the views expressed are the personal views of the author and CMHC accepts no responsibility for them.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Toronto, ON – March 12, 2024 – A new data mapping tool launched today, called the Low-end of Market Rental (LEMR) Housing Monitor. The tool presents critical information on the affordable “low-end” of the private rental housing stock in six urban regions across Canada: Calgary, Halifax, Greater Montreal Area, Greater Toronto Area, Metro Vancouver Area, and Winnipeg.
Until now, not enough was known about the existing stock of deeply affordable rental homes in cities across Canada, making it difficult for decision-makers to develop and evaluate policies and programs that effectively tackle the housing affordability crisis.
“Millions of people across Canada are impacted by a lack of affordable rental housing, and renters with lower incomes are facing especially alarming challenges securing homes they can afford,” says Annie Hodgins, Executive Director of the Canadian Centre for Housing Rights (CCHR). “We know that decision-makers across Canada are very concerned about the escalating affordable housing crisis, and they are searching for solutions. The LEMR Housing Monitor will equip them with the data they need to make impactful decisions when it comes to preserving the few affordable homes that still exist, and increasing the supply of housing that is affordable to people with lower and middle incomes.
By presenting data from federal, provincial and municipal sources that have been integrated into a single tool for the first time, the LEMR Housing Monitor will help fill knowledge gaps and uncover key trends impacting affordability. It can be used by policymakers, urban planners, housing providers, service providers and housing advocates to enrich evidence-based decision-making in housing across Canada.
“By integrating data from dozens of federal, provincial and municipal sources, the LEMR Housing Monitor provides us with important context and a deeper understanding of trends in affordability than any one data source could,” says Megan Earle, CCHR’s Data Scientist. “This is a one-of-a-kind tool that provides insight into housing trends in a way we haven’t seen until now.”
The LEMR Housing Monitor features interactive maps that display data related to characteristics of the affordable housing stock within a defined area including the number of affordable units, types of units (i.e. market vs. non-market), and vacancy rate. The maps also include layers of information about renter households and building and neighbourhood characteristics (e.g. eviction rates), which provide additional context to the housing stock data and insight into regional differences. A date filter can be applied to observe how the data changes over time.
Initial insights gleaned from the tool include that less than half of bachelor and one-bedroom rental units are affordable for one-person households in all of the six regions studied. The tool has also revealed that between 2006-2021, the percentage of rental homes that are affordable to one-person households decreased between 8 per cent and 54 per cent across these regions.
“Anecdotally, we’ve heard that the number of affordable rental homes is diminishing and that they are increasingly unavailable in central urban areas,” says Daniel Liadsky, Managing Director of Purpose Analytics. “The LEMR Housing Monitor will help to translate anecdotes into evidence by articulating the magnitude of this issue and identifying where it is most acute.”
“This tool is more than a data bank; it represents a significant shift in how we approach housing decisions,” says Marlene Coffey, CEO of the Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association (ONPHA). “With government and cross-sector partners, we can turn numbers into meaningful action, safeguarding our vital community housing supply and strategically investing in housing needs across the continuum.”
The LEMR Housing Monitor was developed by the Canadian Centre for Housing Rights (CCHR), Purpose Analytics, the Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association, and R and Shiny Developer Sharla Gelfand.
About the Canadian Centre for Housing Rights (CCHR)
The Canadian Centre for Housing Rights (CCHR) is Canada’s leading organization working to advance the right to housing. For over 35 years, CCHR has worked at the intersection of human rights and housing. We do this by serving renters to help them stay housed, providing education and training about housing rights, and advancing rights-based housing policy through research, policy development, advocacy and law reform.
About Purpose Analytics
Purpose Analytics works to build a data-informed non-profit sector, by supporting non-profit organizations to use data to support decision-making and communicate impact, and cultivating a network of people in the non-profit sector who work with data.
About the Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association
Founded in 1988, the Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association (ONPHA) is an independent association funded and directed by its members. ONPHA leads, unites and supports a strong community-based affordable housing sector that helps to build vibrant, healthy and diverse communities for all Ontarians.
About Sharla Gelfand, R and Shiny Developer
Sharla is a freelance R and Shiny developer and a statistician. Their work specializes in developing tools that enable easier access to data and replacing manual, repetitive work with repeatable, reproducible, and future-proof processes.
Media contact:
Shelley Buckingham
Director of Communications, Canadian Centre for Housing Rights
Email: media [at] housingrightscanada.com
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.